| « Previous: «上： Hamas Blames the Palestinians for the Situation in Gaza哈馬斯指責巴勒斯坦加沙的局勢 | Next:下一篇： Islam and Gay Rights伊斯蘭教和同性戀權利 » |
More Reuters Bias更多路透偏見
30 August 2006 2006年8月30日 -- - Add this post to del.icio.us 加上這郵政del.icio.usYou think Reuters would have learned a lesson by now - cut the bias and tell the news as it is.你認為路透社便吸取了教訓，現在-削減偏見和告訴記者，因為這是。 Well, the following is really subtle, but it shows the political leanings of the powers that be at Reuters and their underlings.好了，以下是真的微妙，但它顯示了政治傾向的權力，這在路透社和自己的下屬。 The first is a picture of of a woman smoking a cigarette - pretty tame stuff here, right?第一個是圖片的一名女子吸煙煙頭-漂亮溫順的東西在這裡，對不對？ Other than the woman wearing a Muslim headscarf, there is nothing else identifying the location of the picture.除女子身穿穆斯林頭巾，有什麼都沒有確定地點的圖片。 However, Reuters finds a way to take a poke at Israel.不過，路透社找到辦法，採取捅在以色列。
“A Lebanese woman smokes a cigarette as she looks at the rubble of buildings in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, which were repeatedly attacked by Israeli forces in the 34-day Israeli-Hezbollah conflict, Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2006. "一名黎巴嫩婦女吸一支香煙，因為她期待在瓦礫中的建築物在貝魯特南郊，黎巴嫩，其中多次襲擊，以色列軍隊在34天的以色列和真主黨的衝突，週二， 2006年8月29日。 A ceasefire has been in effect since Aug. 14, 2006.”停火生效以來，自2006年8月14日" 。 (AP Photo/Matt Dunham) （美聯社照片/馬特dunham ）
Rubble of buildings?瓦礫中的建築物？ We don’t see them in the picture?我們並沒有看到他們在圖片嗎？ If it’s not in the picture, why is it even being described?如果它不是在圖片，為什麼它甚至被稱為？ How do we know she wasn’t looking at a poster of Hassan Nasrallah, that’s littering the landscape of southern Beirut now?我們怎麼知道她是不是看一張海報的納斯魯拉，這就是亂拋垃圾景觀的貝魯特南部，現在呢？ How do we know she wasn’t at an outdoor cafe in Paris?我們怎麼知道她是不是在一個戶外咖啡館在巴黎嗎？ Or having a coffee in London?還是因為咖啡在倫敦？ The point is that the picture is merely an opportunity for Reuters to demean Israel.這一點是說，圖片僅僅是一個機會，為路透社貶低以色列。
If the above doesn’t convince you about a vendetta against Israel and Jews, we hope this will.如果上述不信服你一個仇殺對以色列和猶太人，我們希望這會。 Below, a picture of Orthodox Jewish men at the Kotel (Western Wall).下面，圖片的正統猶太男子在kotel （西牆） 。 Pretty innocent stuff, right?漂亮無辜的東西，對不對？ That is, until you read the caption.這就是，直到你讀旁白。
“Ultra Orthodox Jews pray at the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem, Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2006. "超正統派猶太教徒祈禱，在西牆，在耶路撒冷老城，週二， 2006年8月29日。 U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Tuesday called Israel’s air and sea blockade of Lebanon a ‘humiliation,’ while Israel said it won’t end the embargo until forces on Lebanon’s borders can prevent Hezbollah guerrillas from importing new weapons.”聯合國秘書長安南於週二呼籲以色列的空中和海上封鎖黎巴嫩『屈辱，而以色列表示它不會結束禁運，直到部隊對黎巴嫩的邊界，可以防止真主黨游擊隊從引進新武器" 。 (AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko) （美聯社照片/亞歷山大zemlianichenko ）
Now, what do Orthodox men praying at the Western Wall have to do with Kofi Annan and his biased accusations against Israel, and the Israel government’s response?現在，是什麼正統男人祈禱在西牆都與安南和他的偏見，指責以色列，和以色列政府的反應如何？ These guys are going about their daily routine praying!這些傢伙都是各自的事情，每天例行的祈禱！
Don’t get us wrong - we think it’s great to have pictures of people going about their regular day-to-day duties in the Middle East.不要誤解我們-我們認為這非常有照片的人各自的事情，定期的日常職責，在中東。 But the question is, why is Reuters so intent on bringing up the war, even when the pictures are totally disconnected from the war?但問題是，為什麼是路透社的意圖，所以就帶來了戰爭中，甚至當照片是完全截斷，從戰爭嗎？ By focusing on the conflict, Reuters is actually contributing to the conflict.著眼於衝突，路透社，其實是助長衝突。 God forbid we should see people doing normal activities in the Middle East!但願我們應該看到一些人做正常的活動，在中東！
Tags:標籤： Arab/Muslim World阿拉伯/穆斯林世界 , ， Commentary評 , ， kofi annan安南 , ， media bias媒體偏見 , ， reuters路透社
November 5th, 2006 at 2:03 pm 2006年11月5日，在下午2點03分
I have heard that while ago there was a story about Reuters bias that came out of Reuters.我聽說前一陣子有一個故事，關於路透偏見出來的路透社。 Its essence was that they couldn’t report the facts of Palestinian terror because reporters would have been killed by the Arabs at worst or denied further access at best.其本質是，他們無法報導事實，巴勒斯坦的恐怖活動，因為記者會已被殺害，由阿拉伯人在最壞的，或得不到進一步進入最好。 This was not a problem for most Reuters reporters because many were people who supported the Arab cause in the first place.這是不是一個問題，為最路透社記者，因為很多人的人，支持阿拉伯事業擺在首位。
I’ve been trying to find this article.我一直試圖找到這篇文章。 Can you help me?你能幫助我嗎？