04 April, 2002, 13:09
I see that author of this site learned much from Goebbels. i hope you'll finish
like him and his "friends".
Actually,
Goebbels relied on propaganda - yes, that means lies.
This site is all about truth - verifiable truth.
04 April, 2002, 08:40
"The second is that they bombed the British who had no intention of staying
in the region."
Of course Israelis only use violence because of their honorably intention. Do
you really believe that?
Yes. Their intention was not to
kill innocent people, as homocide bombers do.
Sharon is the most honorable Israeli:
Member of Haganah and killer of British soldiers, 1954 killer of many civilists
in Qibya, 1982 he caused killing of many civilist in refugee camps Sabra and
Shatila, 2000 to 2002 again responsible for killing many civilists (list is not
complete).
Where
are you getting your data from? I don't know about his
early days, but he did not "cause killing" of any
civilians in Lebanon - the Christian Phalangists did
that. As for the person responsible for killing many
civilians in 2000 to 2002, I think the only person to blame is
Yasser Arafat.
Sharonīs aim for decades is not to integrate Palestinians but to deport them to
Jordan or anywhere else.
Do you have proof for this claim, or is this another one of
your lies?
I understand why he is called "Bulldozer".
Do
you? Good for you. Do you know why Yasser Arafat
is called "a terrorist". I do.
Arafat is as incredible as Sharon. He also killed and kills civilists - he is a
hardliner like Sharon.
How
can you lay blame on the two equally? One is a
democratically elected official. The other is a
dictator.
If both say "peace" they mean "wipe out".
That guarantees a peaceful future in the Middle East...
Yeah...what
kind of peace?
By the way, donīt try to tell me, Sharon just wants safety for Israel. His
history tells the real truth. He supported settlement during 70's and 80's in
the Westbank area in order to prevent to give back the occupied* area to the
Palestinians. He destroys police stations as well as ANY infrastructure in
Westbank. He wants to establish a Israel state without any Palestinians.
And
what was the excuse for terrorism before Ariel Sharon became
Prime Minister in 2001? Ooops, that's where your
argument falls apart.
* occupied: remember history. Palestine was an area with about 1 million
inhabitants at the beginning of the 20th century. Zionists claimed that land
"without people" (1 million people are nothing? - itīs definitely NOT
true that this area was empty) for people without land (themselves). I donīt
wonder the inhabitants living there didnīt feel lucky because of the UN
partition plan.
Why
were there Arabs there in the first place? What was
their population in the preceeding decades? The answer
is that is was much lower. Why? Because the Jews
who were their brought economic opportunities unavailable in
the rest of the backwards Arab world.
Partition of a country and giving a part away to other
sovereigns causes trouble, because the inhabitants feel occupied. Palestinians
didnīt call themselves Palestinians before 1960's. But that doesnīt matter.
They have got a right to live there.
But
how can you tell who is a "Palestinian" and who is
just another Arab? You can't because they're just like
the other Arabs. They didn't call themselves
Palestinians before the 1960's because they weren't a
nation. They were a bunch of migrants to the area, in
search of economic opportunities.
The war forced them to flee in 1948, not
the Arabs like you claim. Donīt tell me Arabs began the war and the refugee
tragedy is their fault - it is clear that they had to fight occupation. What
would Israel feel like if UN suddenly wants to part the country because they
plan to settle any kind of people there? A settlement in that region about 2000
years ago is not a acceptable reason for anybody living there now.
So
what about the million Jews that were forced to leave their
house in Arab lands? Are they irrelevant? They
lost everything, and they actually had something to begin with
(unlike the Arabs).
Stop - I donīt want to claim itīs fault of Israel.
Pogroms, blood libels, antisemitism, holocaust during the past several hundred
years in Europe made it necessary to find a solution.
But establishing Israel was done in such a unsensitive way.
What
was the alternative?
No wonder there are
lots of troubles.
Yup,
no wonder.
04 April, 2002, 05:00
Who bombed the King David Hotel, and other sites back in the 40's ????
It was the Jews, who
were fighting against a REAL occupation force. By the
way, the occupants of the hotel were notified in advance of
the bombing - of course, this little detail is usually left to
the end. If the Brits decided that they weren't going to
believe the warning, who's fault is it that so many people
died? If only Jews were given warnings of bombs going
off, no Jews would die any more.
The star of David is made up of many broken crosses.
Is this a geometry lesson?
Shame Shame Shame
04 April, 2002, 04:15
I've noticed that almost all pro-Israel comments are well thought out and
intelligently written. Anti-Israel comments include ignorant assumptions
and half truths (not to mention countless spelling errors). It is clear
that those who are against Israel are blinded by hate, or do not have the
education to allow them a credible opinion.
Exactly.
If only they'd open their eyes to see the truth.
04 April, 2002, 04:10
Palestinian children believe in their cause because they are forced to.
Israeli children believe in their cause as a result of education, reason and
faith.
Your words are wise!
LONG LIVE ISRAEL
Amen!
